Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Thoughts on Consumerism: Geek-A-Week, Crowdsourcing, and the Empowerment of Consumer Agency


Me and My Geek-A-Week cards, look at that happy face!


I've been thinking about Consumerism a lot recently. A lot of that probably comes from me purging a lot of possessions in order to move across the Country and deciding what to keep and what to lose. Also what I had to lose because moving said items was not an option. That is particularly difficult. I had a lot of furniture that was my grandparents. I've known that furniture my whole life. I had many positive memories associated with said furniture. The smell of that armoire is still strong in my memory. Weird.

This Order of Worship was stuck to the inside of the Armoire since 1987

Anyways, here is the thing that kicked my brain into gear. Len Peralta's Geek-A-Week.
These are really really cool baseball-card esque collectables of famous geeks. It is really sweet. I've had several of them autographed and it is just a fun collection to be part of.

I met Len at PAX East when he had his first set. I was probably totally awkward, but I met him, chatted, and bought his cards. It was my first Con so I was really overwhelmed by the whole experience. I'm sure if I met him again I could be a little less awkward.
Len released subsequent sets of cards through Think Geek, making up a deck of 52.
But since this is the age of social media, the digital marketplace, and Crowdsourcing; Len turned to Kickstarter for his Season 2 & Season 3: Legends of Video Games sets.

It is a fantastic way for an artist to really reach his audience. And there are rewards to being a part of something of this nature. With Season Two I received a B&W sketch of whatever I wanted. I had Len draw a Ninja Turtle Jedi. It is awesome. I have it framed and sitting in my Nerd Shrine.  With Season 3, I gave enough to get the extra cards that were for backers only. Exclusivity is a powerful tool, for good or ill.

Today his newest Kickstarter jumped from $19k to $40K (as of publishing it is ), reaching his goal. I was worried that he wasn't going to reach that $38k goal while looking at it last night. He only had 9 days left. Gotta thank the internet for stepping up! I'm sure Len is blown away. I would be. I'm very excited for this new set of 52, that is going to take over a year to create and send my way. Yeah, I'm in it for the long haul.

When Len's Kickstarter jumped this morning, I tweeted at him, congratulating him and said I was proud to be part of the Geek-A-Week Collective. Originally I wrote "family" but "collective" seemed to be a way geekier and appropriate title. We collect these cards but we also help fund their creation. We fund them in a different way than ever before.

Social Media can be cool.

Throughout history the Church, corporations, and the wealthy; commissioned Art and employed artists. Also, businesses had to search for investors and loans to help get their ideas into reality. Now we have a combination of these things with another incredible addition: Democratization via Consumer Inclusion.
    
If you think about the idea of this it is incredible. This has never truly existed until now. It has never really been possible until now. We are both commissioning art as well as investing in the Artist. Now we aren't "investing" in the traditional sense, in order to gain a profit. But in the case of Len Peralta, we are investing in Him. We are providing financial support that is in turn emotional support. We are saying, "Here is money to do what you want to do, because we believe in You. We love what you make. Do your thing and thrive!"

Looking at the larger scale, there are certain brands that I hold dear and am emotionally invested in. Disney creates happy feelings, Brooks Brothers makes me think Quality, and Nintendo rockets me to FunTown. But this has always been a passive investment. I'm not really involved in what they create. Yes, buy using my money to purchase what I want, I am using that dollar to tell the corporation what to make, but I'm co-opted by other consumers who may not care for what I enjoy. Niche markets have this problem. "Not enough people bought said product, so we aren't going to make that anymore." It is understandable but it is one of the flaws of Free Market Capitalism.
 

Don't take things to seriously

With Crowdsourcing something so niche as Geek "celebrities", whom most people would never recognize, being immortalized in collectable card form can not only exist but thrive. Versus pitching Geek-A-Week to Baseball card manufacturer Topps. They are probably struggling to exist due to the lack of interest in Baseball cards themselves. They used to be ubiquitous, but now they are their own niche market, but with a history and a wealthy consumer base full of nostalgia. How would you get Geek-A-Week off the ground?

It is more than selling though. I feel invested. I feel as if I'm a part of something. I helped bring into creation a thing that I want. Would I buy this product? Yes. I did. I wasn't emotionally invested in Season 1. I just liked them. But from Season 2 onward, I've become part of Geek-A-Week. Along with many others, whom I've dubbed the Geek-A-Week Collective.

Now, I have some issues with Crowdsourceing. It is not all sunshine and rainbows. When someone who has access to investors and money, for example Zach Braff going to Kickstarter to help fund his film, that leaves a very bad taste in my mouth. It doesn't seem Just to have someone with resources to take to Crowdsourcing. Leave it to the people who need it. It seems like some kind of perversion. But then again, Crowdsourcing is representative of a Free Market. So as long as projects like Geek-A-Week, small Independent Films, and crazy inventions like 'Bug-A-Salt'; keep getting funded, I will have no real issue with major industry players also using Crowdsourcing to help fund their projects.

Scrubs, Garden State, and a King of Photobombs

It is part of "Conscientious Consumerism", something that I am trying to be a part of. Knowing from where my products come, what impact they have on the environment, and the conditions on which they are made. We live in a Capitalist society. It is not a perfect economic system, but it is the one we have. One day we may live in a Roddenberry-eque future where there is no lack of resources and every individual can pursue their individual passions, but until that time, We, as a society & species, need to use our purchasing power to enable a better world. With Crowdsourcing as a viable and very real tool at our disposal, the Consumer can take control away from "the other" be they good or bad, and Democratize what we want to buy instead of being told what to buy.

I don't know if Len thinks of his Geek-A-Week as a prime example of how the Future of Humanity is very bright and hopeful. It may not be that deep for him. But for us Internet Philosophers and Thinkers who are vain enough to put our ideas into words and throw them out there for anyone to read, he has made the World a better place. Thanks Len! Congratulations on your funding! I hope you reach your stretch goals because more cards is better than fewer cards. Also my Ninja Turtle Jedi is still badass.


so cool

Shine on you crazy diamonds.

Sunday, January 12, 2014

Downton: Revisited - A Prologue


Biltmore is more beautiful than Downton. USA USA USA!!!

Forgive my petulance, but I do play favorites, also I prefer French Renaissance Inspired Architecture to Jacobethan (too pointy). Biltmore is probably my favorite historic home I've ever visited, nothing really compares to its scale. But if I got to visit Highclere Castle (the real home that is the fictional Downton) I'm sure I would be delighted.

As Facebook may have told you 'Downton Abbey' has returned to PBS for Season 4. Of course in the UK it aired months ago and was called "Series 4". One of these two things is important, one is not.
That's right. "Seasons" make so much more sense than "Series". . . I kid, I kid.

For anyone who enjoys TV from across the pond or "from the other side" as BBC-America calls it, we often have to wait months and even years before programming is aired in the US. Now a few months may not be that long for Downton, except we live in the age of the Internet. 
This means two things.

First: That if we happen to have friends on Facebook, or read blogs, or do Google searches concerning our beloved 'Stately' and the Crawley family who own it, we are quite likely to have Spoilers. From a casual standpoint this is a bit of a "so what", but for a serious fan of the show, it can be devastating.

Second: In this marvelous age of electronic information, it is a simple click of a button to download a HD copy of each episode minutes after the original airing.  This doesn't limit the consumer-turned-pirate to computer watching either. They can drop the file on a jump drive, plug it into their tv, and watch the show as intended, in glorious 16:9. 

And have no doubt, the Cinematographers know exactly what they are doing. This show is gorgeous.

Arri D-21. Get over yourself film, you are so last century.

So while Season 4 plays out for the Yanks (as a Southerner I've always been perturbed by this word to describe Citizens of the US, but it's their TV show, so I'll play by their rules), I'm going to do a retrospective.

I'll be re-watching the entire run of the show. Posting my thoughts and feelings after each episode. I've already seen the first season twice, and the second season twice. The third season socked me right in the feels, so I only did that to myself once, but I will do it again. . . for you Dearest Readers.

But why?

This is an interesting question, to explore the answer, let me tell you a little about me or rather, my mother.

Mom spend a lot of time at Maple Grove, can't understand why. . .

My mother loved Upstairs Downstairs, the original that aired on PBS in the 1970s. It may have been her favorite TV show. But unlike our modern ease of access to quality entertainment, there wasn't digitization, and VHS copies were rare and expensive. You couldn't just Amazon order the show, you had to find it in a store or maybe your local library.  So I never got to enjoy this series with her. (We did love the crap out of Star Trek though, but that may be a different series of blogs)

One other thing my Mother loved was visiting Historic Homes. She was a docent at our local landmark, Maple Grove, and wherever we traveled, if there was a home to visit, we visited it. While my siblings were involved in a lot of this, since I am the youngest, my mother and I visited many places together, just the two of us. I have many fond memories and it also may be why I have a love for visiting historic places to this very day. My mother's memory lives on through me as I enjoy these things.  

Since she is not around to enjoy Downton Abbey, and I am sure she would, I definitely enjoy it for her.  

I've also watched a ton of Period Pieces or Costume Dramas (as they are known in the UK), so I have much to compare. For many in the US and around the World, Downton is their first. But I've seen Pride & Prejudice many times. I've laughed every minute at Jeeves and Wooster. I felt the pain at the end of Captain and the Kings (an American story no less, also name someone else aged 30 or younger who has seen this). I've even been to Brideshead (figuratively, and if you caught the reference in the title of this series of blogs, good for you, Evelyn Waugh would be proud). Basically what I'm saying is that this isn't my first rodeo.

Oh, and I have a degree in History, and have researched a bit of this period, so I'm going to have that perspective as well.

Here's me: American, Male, Straight. I'm an Eagle Scout. If I had me describe myself with these adjectives (all of which are true) I'm sure it conjures up classic Hollywood "American" imagery and lots of Norman Rockwell, but I'm also happy to be much more than that.  

I say these things to break misconceptions. 

Many see Downton as a "chick show", a term I find slightly offensive. Is romance purely feminine? Is Family Drama? Is Feminine a negative characteristic? Of course not. Is Downton a bit soapy? Yes indeed, but at least it doesn't have long arcs over relish. 



 I have to thank 'The Soup' for that, I don't watch Soap Operas, but my grandfather did, and he loved 'em. I think his favorite was 'The Young and the Restless". But I digress. . .

Final Breakdown: I'm going to watch Downton from the perspective of having already watched everything. I'm going to make commentary. THERE WILL BE SPOILERS. This is not going to be a plot breakdown "review" but one of judgement and introspection. I'm going to investigate arcs and character. Look to see what sticks out compared to the current season. And investigate historic accuracies and idiosyncrasies.

I also just learned that when Downton first aired on PBS they shortened the show by 2 hours under the belief that the American audience wouldn't understand the plots? Good thing I watched it on Netflix before it aired in the US, you know, before it was cool.



And to whoever made that call I dare you to compare the biggest hillbilly in the US to the most rural rube in the UK and see who gets more embarrassed.